{Web + Flash + CMS Design}—»»Internet Marketing««—{

Subscribe to Toms Skyline Design Feed ...          Subscribe to Toms Skyline Design RSS Feeds

Posts Tagged ‘money’

Harvard, Twitter and the Pareto Principle

June 20th, 2009 by skyline
skyline

A Harvard Business School study, as reported by Reuters, raises a serious question on the value of Twitter for businesses. Relying upon research by Mikolaj Jan Piskorski, results show greater than 50% of Twitter users will tweet less than one time every ten to eleven weeks. Along with that, many have witnessed Twitter struggling to keep their system running, due to an overload of tweets, apparently by 10% of all Twitter users; who are responsible for blasting out 90% of all tweets. What an interesting twist on the Pareto principle.

Fail Whale says Twitter is Over Capacity

Fail Whale says Twitter is Over Capacity

GoogleAd

Notwithstanding there are some companies utilizing the social value of Twitter, one would have to question whether or not tweeting holds much value for smaller companies. The Harvard study seems to indicate that of all Twitter users they will tweet on average only once during their Twitter lifetime.

What do the ten percent that are responsible for 90% of the tweeting, tweet about? Although there are some tweets about news events, there are also some who simply troll for followers, by repeatedly tweeting a rotated set of keywords. However, the bulk of the tweets I have seen are MLM related, or attempting to sell their information or services. The same tweets are repeated over and over again; many of which, are too incredible to be true. Obviously, all of the people who say they are making twenty gazillion dollars per month; or who can show you how to get 50,000 followers in 90 days on autopilot, are not making the money they say, nor is it possible to build these empires on autopilot. It is, however, possible to send out thousands of tweets making these claims.

Twitter needs to figure out a way to minimize the SPAM that is flowing in the tweets; otherwise the value to businesses and to individuals will quickly diminish; and the only sustainability will be the smell of Hormel on Pareto;s plate.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Plurk Plurk This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post Post to Facebook Post on Facebook Post to MySpace Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Ping This Post Post to Reddit Reddit This Post Post to StumbleUpon Stumble This Post

Twitter Ad Sites: Who Makes the Money?

June 11th, 2009 by skyline
skyline
GoogleAd

There are some brokers on Twitter that will charge an advertiser for exposure on Twitter. Then they find publishers (Twitter users) that will allow the ads or links to be displayed on their respective Twitter page(s). I have seen one or more of these broker sites that do not say what they pay the publishers (or if they do, it is difficult information to locate) … I suppose you find out after you sign up. In my research I stumbled across one of these broker sites that had cultivated about 1,000 followers and with their related traffic they were able make a case for selling the domain. They ended up selling the domain to someone at auction, for $6,000. Actually, they sold it early with a Buy-It-Now-Bid. There’s another idea there. What I found interesting about this particular Twitter business sales pitch, were some of the comments they made about the site, the revenues and the payouts, during their attempt to sell it.

They tell the potential buyer that with their traffic that the new owner should be able to bring in $10,000 a month, but rarely ever have to pay anything out to the publishers, due to the $20 threshold and the CPC rate of $.025 (50% split of the amount charged). So I clicked on the link to this Twitter Ads site; and it took me to a page with a couple of banner ads; giving another page to follow to. When I clicked on that link and went to the new site, I discovered that yes it was a Twitter Ad Broker Site and guess what? This site listed a $.04 CPC and had the $20 monthly threshold policy for publishers, too. It sounds like they are following the same pattern.

This is another program on Twitter to make money, but I have to ask myself, “Is is a good one?” One thing I have seen with these sites is that I may see advertiser testimonials, but do not see any publisher testimonials. You do the research and see what you think. Caveat Emptor seems to be appropriate here.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post Post to Plurk Plurk This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Delicious Delicious Post to Digg Digg This Post Post to Facebook Post on Facebook Post to MySpace Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Ping This Post Post to Reddit Reddit This Post Post to StumbleUpon Stumble This Post